kaal:claim:2808132-017

Because facts-based rulemaking does not anticipate the regulatory issues created by innovation, rulemakers may realize far too late, or never, what new regulatory demands a given innovation generates.

facts-based rulemaking did not anticipate regulatory issues created by innovation, rulemakers may not at all or much too late realize what new regulatory demands apply to a given innovation and associated regulatory issue.

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016), III.1 Ex Post Facts-Based (Trial-and-Error) Rulemaking, p. 18
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

• age of exponential innovation
• purely reactive facts-based rulemaking

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Late or absent recognition of regulatory needfamily: regulatory-lagdynamic-regulationregulatory-failure

• restated_by kaal:claim:2957645-002 Facts-based, ex-post, trial-and-error rulemaking cannot anticipate the regulatory issues created by innovation...
• restated_by kaal:claim:2831040-007 Facts based, ex post, trial and error rulemaking cannot anticipate the regulatory issues created by innovation...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/a4b91c373dda772d...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-017.md | sha256sum