kaal:claim:2808132-021

Regulatory timing under disruptive innovation is a two-sided failure: regulating too early risks inhibiting innovation, while withholding regulation too long risks harm to consumers and markets once regulatory inertia sets in around the disruptive product or service.

The timing of regulation in an environment of disruptive innovation should be a primary concern for policy makers. If policy makers regulate too early, they risk inhibiting innovation; if they withhold regulation too long, they may harm consumers and

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016), III.3 Timing, p. 19
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

• disruptive products or services not yet settled in the market

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Timing dilemma of premature versus delayed regulationfamily: regulatory-laginnovation

• restates kaal:claim:2740477-019 Regulatory timing under disruptive innovation is a two sided risk: regulate too early and innovation is inhibi...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/49a9ab4893cb5c81...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-021.md | sha256sum