kaal:claim:2740477-019

Regulatory timing under disruptive innovation is a two sided risk: regulate too early and innovation is inhibited, withhold regulation too long and consumers and markets are harmed once regulatory inertia has formed around the disruptive product or service.

If policy makers regulate too early, they risk inhibiting innovation; if they withhold regulation too long, they may harm consumers and markets if regulatory inertia has set in around the disruptive product or service.

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016), IV.3. Timing, p. 20
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477

• regulation of a disruptive product or service

mechanismsupport: arguedfailure: Timing dilemma of early versus late regulationfamily: regulatory-laginnovation

• restated_by kaal:claim:2808132-021 Regulatory timing under disruptive innovation is a two-sided failure: regulating too early risks inhibiting in...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is c72871b76fa2ad5a8a69ee8d3defc8f64e624be9052ce763e79cf6c58883f726. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/bf0a774eb35907e1...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-019.md | sha256sum