kaal:claim:2831040-015

The three core law and technology proposals for the pacing problem, regulation via the judiciary, early stage regulation of innovation, and principles based regulation, all have practical limitations and none of them uses dynamic regulatory elements.

Source quote, verbatim

None of these proposals uses dynamic regulatory elements. By contrast, dynamic regulation emphasizes dynamic elements in regulating innovation.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016), I. Introduction, p. 7
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: static remedies for a dynamic problemfamily: regulatory-lagdynamic-regulation

Related claims

supported_by kaal:claim:2834531-040 The principle based approach has a shortcoming the authors concede: it is usually impossible to comply with pr...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is de5156f14f44a5753cab55b6c4b03049eda58a143b99e08ef427aee1d261e1bf. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/4c5c7a77ab620f3a...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2831040-015.md | sha256sum