kaal:claim:2831040-032

Anticipatory rulemaking in the dynamic framework is accomplished by combining institution specific, decentralized, and timely information with feedback effects, which can occur between public and private rulemakers, between outcomes and institutions, across jurisdictions, and between rules and rulemaking processes.

Source quote, verbatim
It relies on the use of institution-specific, decentralized, and timely information5 in combination with feedback effects (Kaal 2014b). Feedback effects can occur in several settings including feedback processes between different public and private rulemakers
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016), IV.2 Optimizing Anticipatory Governance, p. 20
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040

Classification

designsupport: argueddynamic-regulationinstitutional-designdecentralization

Related claims
Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is de5156f14f44a5753cab55b6c4b03049eda58a143b99e08ef427aee1d261e1bf. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/1d488c0da2f12acd...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2831040-032.md | sha256sum