kaal:claim:2834531-023

In the Airbnb case, the selection of the relevant facts and the residency rule that followed from it benefit vested interests, most obviously the hotel industry that stands to lose from Airbnb's competition.

Source quote, verbatim

Of course, the selection of the "relevant facts" in this case and the resulting rule benefits certain vested interests, most obviously the hotel industry who stand to lose out from the new competition from Airbnb.

From

Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Regulation Tomorrow What Happens When Technology Is Faster Than the Law (2017), A. Facts Today, p. 19
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2834531 · source PDF

Cite as

Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Regulation Tomorrow What Happens When Technology Is Faster Than the Law (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2834531

Holds when

short term rental rules requiring hosts to reside in the property

Classification

mechanismsupport: arguedfailure: rule capture through fact selectionfamily: regulatory-capture-and-incumbent-advantageeconomics

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 9cd875ebdb0266febbdcdabfca5b9b9f0de1b7ad9e3d5a8a5971bdbe469323b7. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/13bbf05852ce2c02...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2834531-023.md | sha256sum