kaal:claim:2957645-010

Feedback effects, defined as informational exchange processes between public and private rulemakers, between outcomes and institutions, between rules and rulemaking processes, and across jurisdictions, are a central tenet of the theory of dynamic regulation.

Feedback effects occur when an informational exchange process exists between public and private rulemakers, outcomes and institutions, rules and rulemaking processes, and jurisdictions.20

Kaal, Dynamic Regulation via Contingent Capital (2017), II. Dynamic Regulation, p. 9
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2957645 · source PDF

Kaal, Dynamic Regulation via Contingent Capital (2017). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2957645

definitionalsupport: assertedinstitutional-designdynamic-regulation

• restates kaal:claim:2831040-032 Anticipatory rulemaking in the dynamic framework is accomplished by combining institution specific, decentrali...
• extends kaal:claim:2808132-031 Unrestricted exchange of information between public and private rulemakers creates regulatory synergies that i...
• extended_by kaal:claim:2998097-019 Rules become adaptable when institutions and rulemaking processes integrate feedback effects, including feedba...
• extends kaal:claim:kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-001 Dynamic regulation is a supplemental regulatory tool, not a replacement for existing rulemaking: it increases ...
• restates kaal:claim:2267560-021 Opportunities for integrating dynamic elements into the rulemaking process include intra-jurisdictional feedba...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 250b10782a5ea5dece9235a7f711aee408feaf36f2e78e310d589b5ee6304be2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/7ffc40cba6bd391a...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2957645-010.md | sha256sum