Survey responses from blockchain using private investment fund advisers show that their fee structure deviates from the traditional 2/20 model, with responding managers reporting alternative fee structures that benefited their clients.
Source quote, verbatim
The graph illustrates that the fee structure of those private investment fund advisers that use blockchain technology (and responded to the survey) deviates from the traditional 2/20 model.
From
Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Applications and Fee Structure Developments in Private Investment Funds (2017), VI. Blockchain-Enabled Pressure on Fee Structure, p. 18 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2959730 · source PDF
Cite as
Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Applications and Fee Structure Developments in Private Investment Funds (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2959730
Holds when
n=59 survey responses drawn from the dataset
the author could not obtain responses from all managers in the dataset
restated_bykaal:claim:2998033-030 Anecdotal evidence suggests that the majority of private fund advisers who use blockchain, artificial intellig...
Verify
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is ebd86972d8817b0c1c80326ae5564476983cedba3f258ff3b2610f156b93fb50. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer. Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/42f1fc205fb94a9b...json Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2959730-041.md | sha256sum