kaal:claim:2992962-015

Not all smart contracts are fully anonymous and untouchable by traditional jurisdictional means, because contracts with a physical performance element, such as peer to peer transportation, do not automatically anonymize the parties.

Source quote, verbatim
Not all smart contracts are fully anonymous and untouchable by traditional jurisdictional means. Some smart contracts will not automatically anonymize the parties because there is a physical element to such a consumer contract.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017), a) Anonymity of Blockchain Transactions, p. 37
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

Holds when
Classification

conditionsupport: arguedsmart-contractslaw-and-legal-systems

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/ea7f0a8852494df7...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-015.md | sha256sum

Positions extending this scholarly claim