kaal:claim:2992962-028

The first of the two core requirements the authors set for distributed jurisdiction is that the anonymity of blockchain based smart contracting be maintained as the technology evolves.

Source quote, verbatim
Our proposal in this paper for a distributed jurisdiction over blockchains has to fulfill two core requirements: 1. The anonymity of blockchain-based smart contracting has to be maintained as the technology evolves.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017), IV. Distributed Jurisdiction, p. 47
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

Classification

conditionsupport: assertedlaw-and-legal-systemssmart-contracts

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/0173ca05ec7ba63c...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-028.md | sha256sum

Positions extending this scholarly claim