kaal:claim:2992962-033

Aragon appears not to post even a summary of its arbiters' reasoning, which may cause the losing party to second guess the legitimacy of the entire Aragon dispute resolution mechanism.

Source quote, verbatim

In fact, Aragon appears to not even post a summary of their arbiters' reasoning which may cause the losing party to second guess the legitimacy of the entire dispute resolution mechanism in Aragon.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017), 2. Intra-Blockchain Solutions: OpenBazaar, p. 52
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

Holds when

the Aragon Network dispute resolution design as described in its whitepaper

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: unreasoned-decisions-undermine-legitimacyfamily: disclosure-ineffectivenesssystemic-risklaw-and-legal-systems

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/adc0432828118b3a...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-033.md | sha256sum