kaal:claim:2998033-009

As of the publication of this article, a review of published court opinions showed that no court had reviewed, assessed, or scrutinized the uses and applications of blockchain technology.

Source quote, verbatim

However, a review of published court opinions suggests that no court at the time of publication of this article had to review, assess, or scrutinize the uses and applications of blockchain technology.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Innovation for Private Investment Funds (2017), II.5. Regulatory Implications, p. 14
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2998033 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Innovation for Private Investment Funds (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2998033

Holds when

based on a Westlaw search of federal and state cases as of 2017

Classification

empiricalsupport: evidencedblockchain

Related claims

restated_by kaal:claim:3002908-008 As of publication, no American or European court had recognized blockchain technology or scrutinized its appli...
extended_by kaal:claim:3002908-002 Regulatory uncertainty around blockchain has three specific sources: insufficient or non existent regulatory g...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is aafb1be3c25cd33da477d759df9ca2f856f0a8fe133d6396da2e75d0af573dbd. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/f1c813ac00ffbc43...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2998033-009.md | sha256sum