kaal:claim:3002908-006

Traditional jurisdictional tests fail for blockchain because the concepts of location and presence do not apply: the blockchain has no location, physical or electronic, and no single node holds the entire chain.

The concept of location or presence in jurisdictional means does not apply to the blockchain. A location for the blockchain does not exist - not physically or even electronically.

Wulf A. Kaal, Marco Dell'Erba, Blockchain Innovation in Private Investment Funds - A Comparative Analysis of the United States and (2017), III. Regulatory Recognition of Blockchain Technology, p. 12
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3002908 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Marco Dell'Erba, Blockchain Innovation in Private Investment Funds - A Comparative Analysis of the United States and (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3002908

mechanismsupport: arguedfailure: location-based-jurisdiction-failurefamily: jurisdictional-conflictlaw-and-legal-systemsblockchain

• restated_by kaal:claim:3441904-032 Traditional jurisdictional principles cannot directly apply to blockchain technology because the blockchain is...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 06a7b61e75f905ee07e422e875d83a65c5033a248a6e05a213523b034e5db534. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/9cb0d5bc7729ebea...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3002908-006.md | sha256sum

• Extension: A Secure and Decentralized Blockchain-Based Electronic Voting Framework with Smart Contract Enforcement
• Qualification: Structuring Special Purpose Vehicles for Financing Renewable Generators on a Blockchain Marketplace