kaal:claim:3125822-009

The platform's ability to function among anonymous and potentially hostile users is conditional: it holds only if smart contracts that engage experts for off-platform work voluntarily include the recommended protocol choices, which the minimal core itself does not require.

Source quote, verbatim

However, the platform was designed to thrive in an environment with anonymous, potentially hostile users, if the following choices are chosen to be included in all smart contracts which use experts for off-platform work:

From

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Vlad Andrei, Blockchain Infrastructure for Measuring Domain Specific Reputation in Autonomous Decentralized and A (2018), 3.2.4 Contract freedom and fees, p. 11
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125822 · source PDF

Cite as

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Vlad Andrei, Blockchain Infrastructure for Measuring Domain Specific Reputation in Autonomous Decentralized and A (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125822

Holds when

core imposes no smart contracting language
depends on expert policing of non compliant contracts

Classification

conditionsupport: arguedinstitutional-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is d4d0bbaa3260968226186131d60e6d64a53e904d94e4295c61fd17042f1191ef. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/9536c6b87247c9f1...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125822-009.md | sha256sum