kaal:claim:3125827-031

Running the reputation platform on the very blockchain it validates destabilizes the system because it increases the likelihood of forks: every validation pool result is itself a transaction that must be included in a future block requiring its own validation, without end. The authors judge this destabilization non catastrophic for most imagined uses.

Source quote, verbatim
But this self-referential architecture destabilizes the system as it increases the likelihood of forks.
From

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Secure Proof of Stake Protocol (2018), 5.2 Block production, p. 21
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125827 · source PDF

Cite as

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Secure Proof of Stake Protocol (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125827

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: self-referential-destabilizationfamily: consensus-and-protocol-attackconsensus-and-security

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 598d9bd95e4af7a0a35328677c6bfc069f69f2e32c30c720b3a0be98a23a40cb. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/ebefc20e4f9a322c...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125827-031.md | sha256sum