kaal:claim:3266953-014

Smart contracts cannot by themselves carry human business interactions, because those interactions require flexibility in interpreting intent that is at odds with the merciless mathematical logic of smart contract code.

Human business interactions require a flexibility that is at odds with the merciless mathematical logic of smart contracts.

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper (2018), Motivation, p. 10
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3266953 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3266953

• business collaborations with unanticipated eventualities or partial performance

conditionsupport: arguedfailure: rigidity of smart contract logicfamily: smart-contract-rigiditysmart-contracts

• restated_by kaal:claim:3411897-032 Human business interactions require a flexibility that is at odds with the merciless mathematical logic of sma...
• restated_by kaal:claim:3405401-009 Despite their benefits, smart contracts are subject to significant limitations because human business interact...
• restated_by kaal:claim:3406323-032 Smart contracts fail to accommodate human business interaction because code does not follow the same logic on ...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 781758dea356e55d79c73ad7f1debe7c83de398bd1cd9e0a9a6c2802f276b4c0. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/b87abb0283c648db...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3266953-014.md | sha256sum