kaal:claim:3406323-032

Smart contracts fail to accommodate human business interaction because code does not follow the same logic on similar terms as natural human language, so the flexibility in interpreting intent that human dealings require cannot be ensured.

Human interaction requires flexibility in interpreting intent that cannot be ensured by smart contracting because smart contract code does not follow the same logic on similar terms as natural human language.

Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization - A Primer on the New Economy (2019), VI. Evolution, p. 16
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3406323 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization - A Primer on the New Economy (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3406323

• human business interactions requiring interpretation of intent

failuresupport: arguedfailure: rigidity-of-mathematical-logicfamily: smart-contract-rigiditysmart-contracts

• restates kaal:claim:3405401-010 Smart contracting cannot ensure the flexibility in interpreting intent that human interaction requires, becaus...
• restates kaal:claim:3266953-014 Smart contracts cannot by themselves carry human business interactions, because those interactions require fle...
• restated_by kaal:claim:3411897-032 Human business interactions require a flexibility that is at odds with the merciless mathematical logic of sma...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 6293780b57a1ae1de17ec00f99cc94295d4f72ea4d08b17a5c08c44772b221db. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/c414a377bed829e5...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3406323-032.md | sha256sum