kaal:claim:3266953-034

Semada's voting algorithm is designed so that gaming the system is not economically feasible without contributing genuinely valuable improvements, because value is proven through the fees added to the system and every fee is subject to a fair validation pool.

Source quote, verbatim

The voting algorithm of Semada core is designed to combat that very system, so that it is not economically feasible to game the system without adding genuinely valuable improvements, as proven with the fees that are added to the system and the fair validation pool that every fee is subject to.

From

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper (2018), Sockpuppet Protocol, p. 21
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3266953 · source PDF

Cite as

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3266953

Holds when

fees attached to each contribution
validation pool review of every fee

Classification

designsupport: arguedgovernance-designconsensus-and-securityrisk-and-incentives

Related claims

extends kaal:claim:3125822-014 Reddit's upvote system imposes insignificant punishment for voting randomly, and this lack of cost compromises...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 781758dea356e55d79c73ad7f1debe7c83de398bd1cd9e0a9a6c2802f276b4c0. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/0f4557a42d9beca9...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3266953-034.md | sha256sum