kaal:claim:3125822-014

Reddit's upvote system imposes insignificant punishment for voting randomly, and this lack of cost compromises the informational value of an upvote, which is the failure mode a staked validation pool is designed to avoid.

As a second example, Reddit's upvote system currently has insignificant punishment for voting randomly, which compromises the value of the meaning of an upvote

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Vlad Andrei, Blockchain Infrastructure for Measuring Domain Specific Reputation in Autonomous Decentralized and A (2018), 4.1.2 Tyranny of the majority and tragedy of the commons problems, p. 13
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125822 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Vlad Andrei, Blockchain Infrastructure for Measuring Domain Specific Reputation in Autonomous Decentralized and A (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125822

• applies to unstaked voting systems

empiricalsupport: evidencedfailure: costless votingfamily: reputation-system-gaminggovernance-designrisk-and-incentivesreputation

• extended_by kaal:claim:3266953-034 Semada's voting algorithm is designed so that gaming the system is not economically feasible without contribut...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is d4d0bbaa3260968226186131d60e6d64a53e904d94e4295c61fd17042f1191ef. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/9b06bf16acf73617...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125822-014.md | sha256sum