kaal:claim:3405660-023

Indirect regulation asks banks to fully assess the risk they incur from hedge fund counterparties, but that assessment is often dubious at best because of the opacity of hedge fund activity.

Regulators who regulate banks' risk management processes are in essence asking banks to fully assess the risks they incur in engaging with hedge funds as their counterparties. That assessment is often dubious at best.

Kaal, Indirect Regulation of Hedge Funds (2019), IV. Indirect Regulation, p. 19
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3405660 · source PDF

Kaal, Indirect Regulation of Hedge Funds (2019). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3405660

• banks face opaque hedge fund counterparties

failuresupport: arguedfailure: unreliable counterparty risk assessmentfamily: supervisory-capacity-gaprisk-and-incentivessystemic-risk

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is cf507b1833071765bc13a5605f38c2591582eca85f40869e38b6ff075c04d29d. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/df72f164b4457180...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3405660-023.md | sha256sum