kaal:claim:3441904-042

Reputation based metrics were ineffective in centralized governance systems because before blockchain, reputation could not be stored autonomously, anonymously, and transparently, so it was not a reliable predictor of actors' future actions.

Source quote, verbatim
Before the emergence of blockchain technology, reputation could not be stored autonomously, anonymously, and transparently. Accordingly, reputation was not a reliable predictor of actors' future actions in centralized governance systems.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain-Based Corporate Governance (2019), V.5 Reputation-Based Governance, p. 39
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3441904 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain-Based Corporate Governance (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3441904

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: unreliable-centralized-reputationfamily: reputation-system-gamingreputationconsensus-and-securitydecentralization

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e6b562527f7f19accaa35491db0a0db168b6a936755e1dca424e9f30bee7a815. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/0c5a8857d1f85d8d...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3441904-042.md | sha256sum