Applying a common legal anchor and traditional jurisdictional principles to cybernetic systems is near impossible, because the status of a cybernetic system is constantly changing.
Source quote, verbatim
Applying a common legal anchor and traditional jurisdictional principles to cybernetic systems is near impossible because the status of the cybernetic system is constantly changing.
From
Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020), III.2 Regulatory Uncertainty, p. 27 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481 · source PDF
Cite as
Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481
Holds when
the system is cybernetic, meaning the community continually chooses which protocol version to adopt
restated_bykaal:claim:3799320-011 Cybernetic systems change constantly and are less amenable to jurisdictional reach, which makes it nearly impo...
Verify
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 530b3a40c244aeca2eb4c53f4c9b4d6b2962bd6be9f92b4ebe17139c17f4c0e0. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer. Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/a21928b646bc5efa...json Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-016.md | sha256sum