kaal:claim:3652481-016

Applying a common legal anchor and traditional jurisdictional principles to cybernetic systems is near impossible, because the status of a cybernetic system is constantly changing.

Applying a common legal anchor and traditional jurisdictional principles to cybernetic systems is near impossible because the status of the cybernetic system is constantly changing.

Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020), III.2 Regulatory Uncertainty, p. 27
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481

• the system is cybernetic, meaning the community continually chooses which protocol version to adopt

failuresupport: arguedfailure: cybernetic jurisdictional escapefamily: jurisdictional-conflictlaw-and-legal-systemsdao

• restated_by kaal:claim:3799320-011 Cybernetic systems change constantly and are less amenable to jurisdictional reach, which makes it nearly impo...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 530b3a40c244aeca2eb4c53f4c9b4d6b2962bd6be9f92b4ebe17139c17f4c0e0. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/a21928b646bc5efa...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-016.md | sha256sum