kaal:claim:3782193-002

Rigid hierarchies are unstable and inevitably fall, eroded either by internal corruption or by novel external challenges that the hierarchy is not flexible enough to adapt to. These are the second and third destabilizing factors, alongside majority discontent.

Rigid hierarchies are unstable and inevitably fall, eroded from internal corruption or novel external challenges that the hierarchy is not flexible enough to adapt to. These are the second and third factors that explain why centralized organizations are unstable.

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021), Chapter 9. Historical sketches of centralization vs. decentralization, p. 3
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193

• hierarchies whose power relations have become entrenched in secular, codified law

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Brittleness of rigid hierarchyfamily: recentralization-driftdecentralizationinstitutional-design

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 74df9cc9a19a098bdacd0424a4174795f6e184f7a31c8ee7541195186701ebd2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/f6867d34e67dd925...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782193-002.md | sha256sum