kaal:claim:3782193-008

Modern Western democracies, which the authors treat as the largest DAOs ever assembled, show that a network whose members hold diverse values can be united by protocol centralization, and that the destabilizing effect of that protocol centralization can be ameliorated by power decentralization through dynamic governance design.

Analyzing modern Western democracies, the largest DAOs ever as- sembled, shows networks of members with diverse values can be united with proto- col centralization, and its destabilizing effect can be ameliorated by power- decentralization through dynamic design of governance.

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021), Chapter 9. Historical sketches of centralization vs. decentralization, p. 4
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Historical Sketches of Centralization vs. Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782193

• networks uniting members with diverse values
• requires dynamic design of governance

designsupport: argueddaodecentralizationgovernance-design

• restated_by kaal:claim:3782203-004 Protocol centralization, meaning rigid and immediately enforced rules such as those executed by smart contract...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 74df9cc9a19a098bdacd0424a4174795f6e184f7a31c8ee7541195186701ebd2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/f2c9f5a36838d765...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782193-008.md | sha256sum