kaal:claim:3782198-005

Social networks grow exponentially more powerful through the network effect, but they are stifled by the centralized ownership and governance of the Web 2.0 companies that run them; governing decentralized information flow requires decentralized incentive designs.

But these networks are stifled by the centralized ownership and governance of the Web ).5 companies that run them. Governing decentralized information flow ne- cessitates decentralized incentive designs.

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Contemporary Decentralization (2021), From Social Media to Decentralized Coordination, p. 6
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782198 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Contemporary Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782198

• applies to networks whose value comes from member interaction

conditionsupport: arguedinstitutional-designdecentralizationrisk-and-incentivesgovernance-design

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e7e1378e3eed06cace6534e7792a7307d607d18bc6beb4ac45896476280728e4. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/41b53897b7b97ba8...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782198-005.md | sha256sum

• Qualification: Governance by Design: A Parsonian Institutional Architecture for Internet-Wide Agent Societies
• Qualification: What Drives the Centralization or Decentralization of Network Governance? A Configurational Analysis in Different Health and Social Care Networks