kaal:claim:3782203-026

Marketing a consensus algorithm as correct by construction is false advertising, because such proofs establish resistance only to the attacks the theorists considered reasonable at the time, not to all possible attacks.

Source quote, verbatim
In the first place, this is simply false advertising. Most people don't understand that CBC doesn't mean it's mathematically proven to be perfectly resistant to all attacks; it's only resistant to the attacks the theorists consider reasonable at the time.
From

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, A Technical Perspective on Decentralization (2021), Application to PoS consensus algorithms, p. 18
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782203 · source PDF

Cite as

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, A Technical Perspective on Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782203

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: false-security-prooffamily: consensus-and-protocol-attackconsensus-and-securityrisk-and-incentives

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is ab8a22d0dbb026a09212a4c85963f3c05787cf80775e8613ae3724e3883e7a56. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/24c1826658c2fe11...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782203-026.md | sha256sum