kaal:claim:3782210-018

Distributing salary equitably, for example equally to all members, is self-defeating: the obvious gaming strategy becomes creating multiple accounts and distributing one's work between them, which is why the salary must be reputation-weighted.

If salary is distributed more equitably, say equally to all members, then the obvious strategy for gaming the system is to create multiple accounts and distribute your work between the accounts.

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Reputation for the Evolution of Decentralization (2021), Inductive argument for reputation architecture, p. 6
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782210 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Reputation for the Evolution of Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782210

• open membership systems where accounts are cheap to create

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Equal salary sockpuppet exploitfamily: sybil-and-identity-attackconsensus-and-securityreputationregulatory-failure

• restates kaal:claim:3782203-036 Paying contributors in reputation tokens rather than fees, and then distributing all fees as a periodic reputa...
• extended_by kaal:claim:3799320-039 Reputation weighted salary distribution solves the sockpuppet attack, because a member who creates ten account...
• extends kaal:claim:3266953-028 A Web of Trust reputation system can be gamed with sockpuppet accounts, because an attacker can behave well fo...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 9cc531ab239f6266c8aeddcc8e54f4c06029c44e825444bee137bbcc0c9d0a8e. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/dc787f6a6ae0036d...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782210-018.md | sha256sum