failure family
sybil and identity attack
- Identity verification tradeoff: Centralized platforms cannot simply drop identity verification, because they need it to keep malicious actors from abusing the network and to ensure w
- Anonymity driven attack surface: Anonymity in blockchain organizations makes them prone to Sybil attacks and 51 percent attacks, and anonymity combined with autonomy has led to many h
- missing authentication of machine trust: The trust humans place in machines on the internet has never been verified, because neither centralized nor decentralized authentication engines have
- sybil attack on centralized reputation: Every centralized reputation score can be sybil attacked, because fake internet accounts or fictitious ratings disrupt true reputation scoring.
- sockpuppet self dealing in web of trust: A Web of Trust reputation system can be gamed with sockpuppet accounts, because an attacker can behave well for a while and then transact with himself
- identity verification does not deter valuable sockpuppets: Identity verification does not fix the sockpuppet problem, because whenever the reputation is genuinely valuable a sockpuppet operator can afford to c
- sockpuppets outpace honest validation: Sockpuppet accounts grow their reputation value much faster than honest users can in a Web of Trust, because sockpuppets validate each other, and the
- chain-cloning-indistinguishability: A malicious party using Sybil accounts cannot be prevented from cloning the structure of a successful proof of stake blockchain at far lower cost than
- Anonymity-enabled attacks: Anonymity in blockchain organizations makes them prone to Sybil attacks and 51 percent attacks, and anonymity combined with autonomy has already produ
- sockpuppet-attack: A DAO permitting anonymous membership is exposed to a sockpuppet attack in which one account behaves honestly while another cheats, and if the cheatin
- sockpuppet abuse of equal distribution: Equal distribution of output, where every member receives an equal share regardless of contribution, is impossible to maintain under current technolog
- multi node reward farming: Uptime based reward policies invite Sybil style abuse: on the original Casper testnet single persons ran fifteen or more validator nodes to exploit cl
- Anonymity dilution at scale: As a network grows its members become more anonymous and individually less important, which makes cheating more locally enticing and less globally not
- Sockpuppet attack: A Web of Trust style reputation ledger, in which each party rates each transaction and reputation is summed with weightings by rater reputation, will
- Fee and KYC pseudo-defense: Charging transaction fees or imposing KYC identity protocols does not solve the sockpuppet problem: such defenses push the cost of defending the netwo
- Equal salary sockpuppet exploit: Distributing salary equitably, for example equally to all members, is self-defeating: the obvious gaming strategy becomes creating multiple accounts a
- Inevitable sockpuppet exposure: Sockpuppet attacks are inevitable in any organization that wants open membership and anonymous members, and since those properties are essential to th
- Sockpuppet attack on Web of Trust: Every single reputational implementation the authors have audited in the blockchain DAO space carries the flaw of vulnerability to the sockpuppet atta
- Anonymous trolling friction: Anonymous decentralized networks can encourage troll behavior because participants feel safe attacking others without retribution, and in a DAO that t
- Sockpuppet attack on web-of-trust vouching: Proof of personhood projects such as Proof of Humanity and UBI DAO fail because they rest on web-of-trust theory, which has been proven not to work lo
- majority-conformity-reputation-gaming: A reputation system that rewards voting with the majority, as Bridge Mutual uses, can be manipulated by users who create multiple wallets and always v
- behavioral-mimicry-sybil-amplification: Sybil attack risk is amplified in reputation-driven systems relative to stake-based ones, because influence derives from behavioral metrics that an at
- Anonymity driven opportunism raises transaction costs: Automating smart contracts under the code is law paradigm incentivizes unethical behavior by enabling anonymous, opportunistic action, which reduces r
- identity-whitewashing: Reputation systems that depend on persistent identity collapse in decentralized settings because agents can create new identities at no cost, so a poo