kaal:claim:3782210-033

One-person-one-vote governance fails on technical questions because half the members have less than average expertise yet equal power, which incentivizes experts to gain power by catering to less expert prejudices instead of pursuing the most effective decisions.

Under a one-person-one-vote system, half of the mem- bers have less than average expertise, but equal power. This incentivizes experts to gain power by catering to less expert prejudices instead of following the most effective decisions.

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Reputation for the Evolution of Decentralization (2021), Security, p. 11
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782210 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Reputation for the Evolution of Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782210

• organizations voting on matters requiring expertise

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Egalitarian voting expertise deficitfamily: governance-participation-collapsegovernance-design

• extended_by kaal:claim:4529715-018 One person one vote governance carries the risk of majority tyranny, in which the majority imposes its will on...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 9cc531ab239f6266c8aeddcc8e54f4c06029c44e825444bee137bbcc0c9d0a8e. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/a346543359bac800...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782210-033.md | sha256sum