kaal:claim:3782210-037

Members should not stake reputation tokens to register an opinion on a contentious topic; strict validation pools should be used only after debate has settled, to verify consensus.

Such con- tentious debate should not use strict validation pools anyway. You should not stake your reputation tokens in order to register your opinion on a contentious topic. Only once the debate has settled, should members risk their reputation to verify consensus with validation pools.

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Reputation for the Evolution of Decentralization (2021), Criticisms, p. 14
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782210 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Reputation for the Evolution of Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782210

• protocol development debates where votes will not be near unanimous

designsupport: arguedgovernance-designopen-source-and-code

• supported_by kaal:claim:3782214-029 If unanimous consensus is strongly incentivized in every validation pool, a DAO will degenerate quickly, becau...
• extends kaal:claim:3125827-024 A healthy expertise will have near unanimous consensus on every evidence of work validation pool, and that ver...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 9cc531ab239f6266c8aeddcc8e54f4c06029c44e825444bee137bbcc0c9d0a8e. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/a3bbcf44607357ee...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782210-037.md | sha256sum