kaal:claim:3782214-029

If unanimous consensus is strongly incentivized in every validation pool, a DAO will degenerate quickly, because members holding minority opinions will not raise alternatives for fear of losing all their reputation tokens; this is why loosely coupled votes are needed.

If unanimous consen- sus is strongly incentivized by every validation pool, our DAOs will degenerate quickly, as alternative options will not be raised by members with minority opinions for fear they will lose all reputation tokens.

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Governance (2021), Legislative long-term governance with deliberative soft protocols, p. 15
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782214 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Governance (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782214

• contentious protocol development
• validation pools that penalize minority positions

failuresupport: arguedfailure: unanimity chilling effectfamily: innovation-chillinggovernance-design

• extended_by kaal:claim:3962614-042 The collective wisdom of DAO investment club members helps hedge against purchase risk, and because decentrali...
• supports kaal:claim:3782210-037 Members should not stake reputation tokens to register an opinion on a contentious topic; strict validation po...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is ba892bb200c1455447c0014f5067a501a93ea9ec413c31942d95952eb3bdfd9d. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/112541c344b6d76f...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782214-029.md | sha256sum