kaal:claim:3782214-030

Loosely coupled voting, in which staked reputation cannot be lost, encourages dissenting opinions, while tightly coupled voting, in which losing stakes are redistributed, guarantees consensus; a DAO steers deliberation by moving between the two.

Loosely-coupled voting encourages dissenting opinions. Tightly-coupled voting guarantees consensus.

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Governance (2021), Legislative long-term governance with deliberative soft protocols, p. 16
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782214 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Governance (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782214

• reputation weighted validation pools

mechanismsupport: arguedgovernance-designconsensus-and-security

• extended_by kaal:claim:3981021-027 Because voting associates can see the sentiment vote outcomes and who staked what reputation before the bindin...
• generalizes kaal:claim:3949098-011 The delayed voting outcomes and feedback effects created by the transition from loosely coupled to tightly cou...
• generalizes kaal:claim:3931933-038 Governance decisions such as network upgrades follow a simple vote that mints no reputation, yet reputation in...
• generalizes kaal:claim:3962614-042 The collective wisdom of DAO investment club members helps hedge against purchase risk, and because decentrali...
• generalizes kaal:claim:3949098-034 Conflicts of interest from DAOIC members participating on the public side of a deal are minimized because the ...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is ba892bb200c1455447c0014f5067a501a93ea9ec413c31942d95952eb3bdfd9d. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/ad9006937a9fadbe...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782214-030.md | sha256sum