kaal:claim:3949098-034

Conflicts of interest from DAOIC members participating on the public side of a deal are minimized because the loosely coupled reputation staking vote and its transition to a tightly coupled vote are transparent to the public.

Source quote, verbatim

However, such practices are rather limited because of the transparent nature of the loosely coupled RNFT voting on a particular deal and the transition to tightly coupled voting.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Reputation as Capital – How DAOs Upgrade Finance (2021), IV. Policy Considerations, 1. Standard Setting, p. 28
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3949098 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Reputation as Capital – How DAOs Upgrade Finance (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3949098

Holds when

loosely coupled votes on particular deals are publicly visible

Classification

mechanismsupport: argueddisclosuregovernance-design

Related claims

extended_by kaal:claim:4067783-018 DAO governance should use a two vote model that distinguishes a loosely coupled vote, where no reputation is a...
specializes kaal:claim:3782214-030 Loosely coupled voting, in which staked reputation cannot be lost, encourages dissenting opinions, while tight...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 04297905564a6092b2db7640561f58fd374d3114c79527357bad09d11b909819. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/8d71470db76ad9e5...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3949098-034.md | sha256sum