kaal:claim:3782217-005

Where a DAO is automated around a single centralized point of failure, the work of decentralizing and giving members redundant power is wasted, because the point of failure functions as a supreme leader and full centralization would be more efficient.

In that case it would be more efficient to completely centralize around the single point of failure the DAO is automated around. The effort you're making to decentralize and give each member redundant power is wasted, because the point of failure might as well be the supreme leader.

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of History In Decentralization (2021), Oracles, p. 3
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782217 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of History In Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782217

• DAO automated around one centralized component

failuresupport: arguedfailure: wasted-decentralizationfamily: recentralization-drifteconomicsdecentralization

• specializes kaal:claim:3782192-027 Centralization is a natural state that evolves out of decentralization under competition unless it is consciou...
• specializes kaal:claim:3782191-026 Centralization has two major flaws that inevitably lead to its downfall; the first is that every centralized o...
• extended_by kaal:claim:4900878-033 Distributing validation and execution across many nodes mitigates central point of failure risk and makes the ...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 358779557d8e7dcd101720ca0fad90b9146d24f1c7c03909eb431fcf1fb7e103. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/4b1cacdaca2faa04...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782217-005.md | sha256sum