kaal:claim:3799320-003

Tying a DAO's legal existence to existing legal and jurisdictional frameworks typically requires a representative in the chosen jurisdiction, which centralizes the DAO and results in the failure of the DAO concept.

Tying the legal existence of a DAO to any forms of existing legal and jurisdictional frameworks typically results in the need for a representative in the chosen legal framework and jurisdiction, which, in turn, centralizes the DAO and results in the failure of the DAO concept.

Wulf A. Kaal, A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of DAOs (2021), Introduction, p. 4
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799320 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of DAOs (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799320

• DAO anchored in an existing jurisdiction
• frameworks that require local representation

mechanismsupport: arguedfailure: Representation-induced legal centralizationfamily: recentralization-driftdecentralizationlaw-and-legal-systemsdao

• restates kaal:claim:3652481-001 Tying a DAO's legal existence to an existing legal and jurisdictional framework typically forces the DAO to ap...
• restates kaal:claim:3652481-023 Existing legal solutions for DAOs typically require some form of legal representation in the relevant jurisdic...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is c3dff852f2d3f04718c829a24189309a7db4d92d84f6045d3d4f562d87c03e63. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/62b6b73108c2dd29...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3799320-003.md | sha256sum