kaal:claim:3799320-037

In the DAO of DAOs, algorithms can exclude cheating members from market access, so punishment becomes automated and therefore credible, and free riding in policing is at least partially eliminated by automation.

Source quote, verbatim

By contrast, in the DAO of DAOs, algorithms can be written which exclude DAO of DAOs members who cheat from having access to their market. Punishment for cheating becomes automated and therefore credible. Free riding in policing can at least partially be eliminated by automation.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of DAOs (2021), Policing and Compliance, p. 23
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799320 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of DAOs (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799320

Holds when

algorithmic contract allocation conditioned on reputation

Classification

mechanismsupport: arguedinstitutional-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is c3dff852f2d3f04718c829a24189309a7db4d92d84f6045d3d4f562d87c03e63. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/25dfd9568c5c4be1...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3799320-037.md | sha256sum