kaal:claim:3995709-033

Because the existing code review market provides no publicly transparent pricing, it arguably harms the public for the benefit of the cartel and its clients, since neither the client nor the code reviewer benefits from public scrutiny of cartel prices.

As such, the existing market arguably harms the public for the benefit of the cartel and its clients. In the existing system, the cartel pricing is not disclosed because both the client and code reviewer may not benefit from public scrutiny of the cartel prices.

Wulf A. Kaal, How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards (2021), Price Discovery, p. 16
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995709 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995709

• the pre existing code audit market

failuresupport: arguedfailure: opaque cartel pricingfamily: information-asymmetrydisclosureeconomics

• restated_by kaal:claim:4755632-031 The existing code review market does not provide publicly transparent pricing, and that opacity is deliberate ...
• restated_by kaal:claim:4734750-025 The existing code review market provides no publicly transparent pricing of review services, and that opacity ...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 6d77dbfb15ee86080bfde0b98089180cabafeb6defdf0f05eaaeb3cb99871e89. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/40e10def74222213...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3995709-033.md | sha256sum