kaal:claim:4755632-031

The existing code review market does not provide publicly transparent pricing, and that opacity is deliberate because neither client nor code reviewer benefits from public scrutiny of the prices, which arguably harms the public for the benefit of the few market players.

In the existing system, the unilateral pricing is not disclosed because both the client and code reviewer may not benefit from public scrutiny of the prices.

Wulf A. Kaal, AI Learning - Decentralized Governance to Optimize Human Output Datasets for AI Learning (2024), Price Discovery, p. 40
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4755632 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, AI Learning - Decentralized Governance to Optimize Human Output Datasets for AI Learning (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4755632

• applies to the existing centralized code review market

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Deliberate Price Opacityfamily: information-asymmetrydisclosureeconomicsopen-source-and-code

• extends kaal:claim:4734750-025 The existing code review market provides no publicly transparent pricing of review services, and that opacity ...
• restates kaal:claim:3995709-033 Because the existing code review market provides no publicly transparent pricing, it arguably harms the public...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 972ccebf0c06ac1767a9e443bb95942b7670e806a63c25ee817c368a64c8eca8. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/e0e6537dfd0a175c...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4755632-031.md | sha256sum