kaal:claim:4067783-033

Braintrust demonstrates that innovation in work structure does not cure governance design: despite redefining work outcomes, it uses a suboptimal one token, one vote model that grants proportional control over network governance.

Despite its advances in innovation for redefining work outcomes, Braintrust uses a suboptimal governance model with a one token, one vote system for proportional control over how the network is governed.

Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Fallacies (2022), III.2 Use #2: Future of Work - Work to Earn, p. 13
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067783 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Fallacies (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067783

• governance by one token, one vote

failuresupport: arguedfailure: One token one vote proportional controlfamily: plutocratic-capturereputationtokenomicsgovernance-design

• supports kaal:claim:3981021-028 Reputation staking overcomes the polarizing effects and suboptimal vote outcomes produced by one token one vot...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 48f1e307cdbbe28c7843f7744d0ba8cf01662f257a53f2066a7a6c7e03a5acec. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/00c5857391624f08...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4067783-033.md | sha256sum