kaal:claim:4529715-015

The most significant risk of bad DAO governance is centralization, in which a small group holds a disproportionate share of power or influence and thereby undermines the decentralized nature of the organization.

centralization, where a small group of individuals or entities hold a disproportionate amount of power or influence within the DAO, which can undermine the decentralized nature of the organization.

Wulf A. Kaal, Josh Bykowski, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) – A Market Meta Analysis (2023), Current state of DAOs, p. 17
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4529715 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Josh Bykowski, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) – A Market Meta Analysis (2023). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4529715

failuresupport: arguedfailure: creeping-centralizationfamily: recentralization-driftdaodecentralizationgovernance-design

• extended_by kaal:claim:5254152-005 Poorly governed DAOs face significant risks of centralization, lack of transparency, and inefficiency, so effe...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 2d71961e8c449afbeaf45ca4f53de8a575d45c77d6960b767d3d1d0874f296b5. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/f5b3a3eeb50fb233...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4529715-015.md | sha256sum

• Qualification: Metaverse Governance: An Empirical Analysis of Voting Within Decentralized Autonomous Organizations
• Qualification: Metaverse governance: An empirical analysis of voting within Decentralized Autonomous Organizations
• Qualification: Multiparty Democracy in Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO): Evidence from MakerDAO