kaal:claim:4685567-012

Kaal concedes that at their worst Impact 1.0 carbon credits are non transparent, fraudulent and fail to mitigate climate change, but contests the inference drawn from that record: operational shortcomings do not necessarily invalidate the underlying theory.

Source quote, verbatim
at their worst, carbon credits in Impact 1.0 are non-transparent, fraudulent and fail to mitigate climate change. Nonetheless, operational shortcomings do not necessarily invalidate the underlying theory
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Impact Investing Innovation - From Impact 1.0 to 3.0 (2024), Social Impact Credits, p. 19
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4685567 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Impact Investing Innovation - From Impact 1.0 to 3.0 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4685567

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Carbon Credit Execution Failurefamily: fraud-and-misconductdisclosure

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 87fb1be89d2661967ed2b0b673fe26448ded3bc3119b122177a4fc13ae5c085c. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/4812dc0e20386ce7...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4685567-012.md | sha256sum