kaal:claim:4734750-008
In hierarchical review, the first reviewer's output receives the highest priority and later reviewers add only minor upgrades, so the review becomes the initial reviewer's work product rather than the collective's.
Source quote, verbatim
The collective of reviewers is also not incentivized to find flaws in the code to optimize code as a work product of the collective. Rather, it is often seen as the work product of the initial reviewer with minor input from follow-up reviewers.
From
Cite as
Holds when
Classification
failuresupport: arguedfailure: First reviewer dominancefamily: recentralization-driftinstitutional-designrisk-and-incentivesopen-source-and-code
Related claims
Verify