kaal:claim:4734750-012

A code review should focus on the functionality of the code and on keeping mistaken, badly constructed, and dangerous code out, rather than on conforming code to a reviewer's stylistic logic.

Source quote, verbatim

Instead, a code review should focus on the functionality of the code and on keeping mistaken, badly constructed, and dangerous code out.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024), Single Points of Failure, p. 14
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750

Classification

designsupport: assertedopen-source-and-code

Related claims

restates kaal:claim:3995709-017 A code review should focus on the functionality of the code and on keeping mistaken, badly constructed, and da...
extended_by kaal:claim:4755632-022 Without crowd control the reviewer's views and the code author's intent are at odds, so a reviewer imposing th...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 60eadf91c0913468505afc664c8d8d1e1673d6c5326d031ca7060addb8ab2eda. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/a049b0a0434ff738...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-012.md | sha256sum