kaal:claim:4734750-024

Subjecting every review to crowd review and policing votes makes reviewers less likely to produce idiosyncratic reviews, because they would face slashing and loss of standing in the community.

Source quote, verbatim

Accordingly, code reviewers are less likely to engage in highly idiosyncratic reviews as they would need to fear slashing and loss of standing in the community.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024), Feedback Loops, p. 18
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750

Holds when

reviewers holding stakeable reputation within the DAO

Classification

mechanismsupport: arguedreputationrisk-and-incentives

Related claims

restates kaal:claim:3995709-030 Crowd review and policing votes by the CRDAO collective filter out idiosyncratic reviewer preferences, because...
restated_by kaal:claim:4755632-030 Mandatory crowd review and policing votes make code reviewers less likely to submit highly idiosyncratic revie...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 60eadf91c0913468505afc664c8d8d1e1673d6c5326d031ca7060addb8ab2eda. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/58ed9cf8f71e40d6...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-024.md | sha256sum