kaal:claim:4755632-030

Mandatory crowd review and policing votes make code reviewers less likely to submit highly idiosyncratic reviews, because idiosyncratic reviewers face slashing of their reputation token scores and loss of standing in the community.

code reviewers are less likely to engage in highly idiosyncratic reviews as they would need to fear slashing of rep token scores and loss of standing in the community.

Wulf A. Kaal, AI Learning - Decentralized Governance to Optimize Human Output Datasets for AI Learning (2024), Feedback Loops, p. 40
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4755632 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, AI Learning - Decentralized Governance to Optimize Human Output Datasets for AI Learning (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4755632

• applies to reviews subject to CRDAO collective policing votes

mechanismsupport: arguedreputationgovernance-designtokenomics

• restates kaal:claim:4734750-024 Subjecting every review to crowd review and policing votes makes reviewers less likely to produce idiosyncrati...
• restates kaal:claim:3995709-030 Crowd review and policing votes by the CRDAO collective filter out idiosyncratic reviewer preferences, because...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 972ccebf0c06ac1767a9e443bb95942b7670e806a63c25ee817c368a64c8eca8. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/fb2d480b12f4fa41...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4755632-030.md | sha256sum