kaal:claim:4734750-029

The community audit should proceed in two stages: an informal vote that reveals collective wisdom to all members, followed by a formal vote in which staked reputation tokens are at risk, and this sequence gives job posters significant quality assurances.

Once the entire community knows how each member feels about the code review examined, the CRDAO now votes in a formal vote in which the reputation tokens staked are at risk.

Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024), Community Audit, p. 20
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750

designsupport: arguedgovernance-designreputationcompliance

• restated_by kaal:claim:4755632-034 A sequenced two-stage vote, an informal community vote that reveals collective wisdom followed by a formal vot...
• restates kaal:claim:4685567-020 The two stage vote is the mechanism that produces consensus: a non binding test vote reveals how every donor a...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 60eadf91c0913468505afc664c8d8d1e1673d6c5326d031ca7060addb8ab2eda. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/1a65bde97893e6fe...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-029.md | sha256sum