The existing code review market does not provide publicly transparent pricing, and that opacity is deliberate because neither client nor code reviewer benefits from public scrutiny of the prices, which arguably harms the public for the benefit of the few market players.
Source quote, verbatim
In the existing system, the unilateral pricing is not disclosed because both the client and code reviewer may not benefit from public scrutiny of the prices.
From
Wulf A. Kaal, AI Learning - Decentralized Governance to Optimize Human Output Datasets for AI Learning (2024), Price Discovery, p. 40 https://ssrn.com/abstract=4755632 · source PDF
Cite as
Wulf A. Kaal, AI Learning - Decentralized Governance to Optimize Human Output Datasets for AI Learning (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4755632
Holds when
applies to the existing centralized code review market
extendskaal:claim:4734750-025 The existing code review market provides no publicly transparent pricing of review services, and that opacity ...
restateskaal:claim:3995709-033 Because the existing code review market provides no publicly transparent pricing, it arguably harms the public...
Verify
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 972ccebf0c06ac1767a9e443bb95942b7670e806a63c25ee817c368a64c8eca8. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer. Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/e0e6537dfd0a175c...json Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4755632-031.md | sha256sum