kaal:claim:4855607-025

Traditional governance models lack the real time responsiveness to community sentiment that a decentralized WDAG system supplies, and this latency, not an absence of rules, is what leaves conventional AI governance out of step with community values.

The WDAG system's decentralized nature, which captures and integrates community sentiment and ethical considerations, provides a real-time responsiveness that is often lacking in traditional governance models.

Wulf A. Kaal, How AI Models are Optimized Through Web3 Governance (2024), Web3 Governance for AI Model Optimization, p. 37
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4855607 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, How AI Models are Optimized Through Web3 Governance (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4855607

• comparison of centralized governance models against decentralized, continuously updated ones

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Governance latency in traditional modelsfamily: governance-participation-collapsegovernance-designdecentralization

• restated_by kaal:claim:4941807-036 Unlike traditional governance models that depend on periodic reviews and updates, the proposed WDAG system dra...
• restated_by kaal:claim:4957318-032 Unlike traditional governance that relies on periodic reviews and updates, the WDAG system taps a continuous s...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is eb0b3e62374b45a8fa888c6bde9725e606bcb46cf4b5e74a6e851d9f25099113. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/949664aa1fed3ab6...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4855607-025.md | sha256sum