kaal:claim:5225296-033

Weighted voting reduces Sybil attack success rates by over eighty-five percent, but only where reputation is openly auditable.

Source quote, verbatim

Simulations of reputation-based systems suggest that weighted voting reduces Sybil attack success rates by over 85% when reputation is openly auditable

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Cryptographic Foundations and Interdisciplinary Dimensions of the Secure Proof of Stake (SPoS) Conse (2025), Weighted Voting as a Sybil Attack Defense
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5225296 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Cryptographic Foundations and Interdisciplinary Dimensions of the Secure Proof of Stake (SPoS) Conse (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5225296

Holds when

reputation must be openly auditable

Classification

empiricalsupport: evidencedgovernance-designconsensus-and-securitycomplianceempirical-evidence

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is b2fec675d906334ad67e13b2d97261dc31e38061022867eb3f9ceadd95f4878d. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/e8f8b2b05ef97839...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5225296-033.md | sha256sum