kaal:claim:5254152-001

One-person-one-vote in DAOs equalizes voting power across participants regardless of financial stake, but it creates the risk of majority tyranny.

This model ensures equal voting power for all participants, promoting democratic decision-making but potentially leading to majority tyranny.

Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Market Meta Analysis 2024 (2024), One-Person-One-Vote, p. 5
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5254152 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Market Meta Analysis 2024 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5254152

• DAOs using a one-person-one-vote governance model

failuresupport: assertedfailure: majority tyranny under equal votingfamily: governance-participation-collapsedaogovernance-design

• restates kaal:claim:4529715-018 One person one vote governance carries the risk of majority tyranny, in which the majority imposes its will on...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is bb2052d809a4615f0f3e2526ba6416293c40d00260149ba4fe6f38addf052796. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/06687d9d782d5e0f...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5254152-001.md | sha256sum

• Extension: Contemporary Decentralized Organizations
• Qualification: Pathways to Performance: A Configurational Analysis of Consensus in DAOs
• Qualification: DAO Market Meta Analysis 2024