kaal:claim:5254152-001

One-person-one-vote in DAOs equalizes voting power across participants regardless of financial stake, but it creates the risk of majority tyranny.

Source quote, verbatim

This model ensures equal voting power for all participants, promoting democratic decision-making but potentially leading to majority tyranny.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Market Meta Analysis 2024 (2024), One-Person-One-Vote, p. 5
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5254152 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Market Meta Analysis 2024 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5254152

Holds when

DAOs using a one-person-one-vote governance model

Classification

failuresupport: assertedfailure: majority tyranny under equal votingfamily: governance-participation-collapsedaogovernance-design

Related claims

restates kaal:claim:4529715-018 One person one vote governance carries the risk of majority tyranny, in which the majority imposes its will on...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is bb2052d809a4615f0f3e2526ba6416293c40d00260149ba4fe6f38addf052796. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/06687d9d782d5e0f...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5254152-001.md | sha256sum